MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274927889 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-01/38/1890

(Invited) Photovoltaic Proprieties and Photocatalytic Activity of Perovskite Oxide-Based Systems

2016· article· en· W2274927889 on OpenAlexaff
Riad Nechache

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocatalysisMaterials scienceBand gapPhotovoltaicsPerovskite (structure)SemiconductorPhotovoltaic systemWater splittingNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsOxideFerroelectricityChemical engineeringElectrical engineeringChemistryCatalysisMetallurgyDielectricEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photocatalytic water splitting with semiconductor materials has been investigated as a clean and renewable process for directly converting sunlight into chemical energy. In particular, multiferroics MFs have recently been used for applications in both photocatalysis (PC) and photovoltaics (PV) due to their ferroelectric properties and narrow band gaps, allowing them to harness the majority of solar radiation in the visible range. As typical MFs, BiFeO3 (BFO) and Bi2FeCrO6 (BFCO) have been recognized as potential materials for PV and visible-light PC applications owing to their suitable band gap (1.4-2.8 eV) and good chemical stability. However, the investigations on such materials for photocatalytic water splitting are still limited and efforts have to be undertaken to demonstrate their full potential. An efficient PV system is at the basis on an effective PC process. Thus, the control of PV properties of MFs is a critical issue for achieving highly efficient photocatalytic system. Here we will present, the controlled growth and characterization of BFCO and BFO thin films and nanostructures via pulsed laser and hydrothermal techniques. The PV properties of such systems and their photocatalytic activity will be also discussed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207