Effect of Surface Roughness on Cyclic Ductility of Corroded Steel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stable cyclic hysteretic behavior is required from structural members to dissipate seismic energy. Limited knowledge exists on the hysteretic behavior of corroded steel, and a relationship that quantifies energy dissipation capacity as a function of section thickness and roughness does not exist. Monotonic and cyclic tests of corroded steel were conducted in this research in an attempt to provide such quantification. Results from coupons suggest that assessing the strength of rusted members by machining a smooth coupon from steel extracted from an existing corroded structure, and only using the resulting yield and ultimate strength values in otherwise standard multilinear monotonic models, may be an unconservative approach. Results from cycling tests show that: (1) rusted steel can exhibit a significant hysteretic energy capacity, (2) a linear relationship exists between the total dissipated energy normalized by mean thickness and the mean 10-point-height of irregularities, and (3) increases in roughness correspond to decreases in the magnitude of total normalized energy dissipated before complete failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it