MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275201953

Effects of Dietary Bovine Lactoferrin on Intestinal Lymphocytes of Mice After Dextran Sulfate Sodium or Acute Exercise Challenge

2008· dissertation· en· W2275201953 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Paul A. Spagnuolo

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLactoferrinDextranChemistryMedicineImmunologyFood scienceBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Inflammation, if uncontrolled, can promote the formation of colon cancer. Intestinal lymphocytes (IL) are immune cells that can participate in inflammation through the generation of cytokines and by causing direct cellular injury. Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, regulates the population of lymphocytes and dysregulation of this process results in the prolonged activation of IL that occurs during inflammation. Therefore, inducing apoptosis of IL is a viable mechanism by which inflammation and possibly colon carcinogenesis could be prevented. Experimentally, inflammation may be induced in mice by: 1) the addition of the chemical irritant dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to drinking water or 2) exposure to acute exercise (AE; intense treadmill running). \nBovine lactoferrin (bLf) is a dietary whey protein with demonstrated ability to promote anti-inflammatory responses by reducing pro-inflammatory or increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine concentrations within the intestine. There are also reports that bLf can alter apoptotic proteins in the intestinal epithelium to favour cell death. Moreover, athletes have been reported to supplement their diets with whey protein; it is also known clinically that after heavy competition some athletes may experience gastrointestinal distress. The role, however, of bLf in reducing inflammation by initiation of apoptosis or alteration of cytokine levels in IL has not been examined. \n \nObjectives: The primary objective of this research was to determine whether dietary bLf affects mouse IL apoptosis and cytokine concentrations in: 1) a normal, non-inflamed state, 2) following AE challenge and 3) following DSS treatment. A second objective was to directly examine the potential protective effects of dietary bLf from inflammatory damage caused by DSS and AE challenge when administered alone or in combination with a carcinogen. \n \nMethods: A total of 252 female C57BL/6 mice were used in the experiments. Apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2, caspase 3, Bax, cytochrome c), inflammatory cytokine proteins (TNF-α and IL-10) and a transcription factor for pro-inflammatory cytokines (NFκB) were determined in isolated mouse IL by Western blot analysis. Flow cytometry was used to determine the extent of apoptosis in mouse IL subsets by measuring phosphatidylserine surface expression using Annexin V+ (ANN+) and propidium iodide staining. Tissue inflammation was determined by histology (H&E staining) on segments of mouse small and large intestine. Diets were prepared and pelletted to contain 20% total protein and contained either bLf or were the control formulation (no bLf). Mice were exposed to bLf containing diets for 4 d or 12 d prior to sacrifice. DSS was provided at 5% in the drinking water for 4 consecutive days prior to sacrifice. Animals were subjected to three repeated bouts of AE (each separated by 24 h rest) involving treadmill running and sacrificed either immediately or 24 h after the final exercise bout. In the experiment involving carcinogenesis, mice were given two subcutaneous injections of azoxymethane (AOM), followed by a two week incubation period, and subsequently exposed to bLf or the control diet. \n \nResults: Results from the first experiment determined that 2.0% bLf was effective at reducing mouse IL levels of TNF-α (p<0.05) (pro-inflammatory) and increasing the percentage of apoptotic CD4+ IL (CD4+/ANN+, p<0.05) in healthy mice. Thus, 2.0% bLf was used for the subsequent experiments. Dietary bLf administration in mice exposed to AE was associated with lower levels in mouse IL of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (p<0.01) and of TNF-α (p<0.05) and NFκB (p<0.05), both pro-inflammatory proteins. Further, the exercise protocol resulted in oxidative stress, as measured by 8-iso prostaglandin F2α levels in plasma, but did not induce intestinal inflammation, evident by the absence of both tissue damage and infiltration of immune cells. Following DSS treatment, mice supplemented with bLf enriched diets had lower levels of both TNF-α (non-significant, 34% reduction) and NFκB (p<0.05) and increased concentrations (p<0.01) of cytochrome c, a mitochondrial protein associated with cell death. DSS exposure in mice resulted in gross morphological alterations and infiltration of immune cells in the small and large intestine; these changes in tissue histology were not affected by the addition of bLf. Mice injected with AOM and then subjected to DSS, but not AE, had increased numbers (p<0.001) of aberrant crypts, preneoplastic colonic lesions, compared to animals only receiving AOM injection. Dietary bLf did not affect any of these carcinogenic processes. \n \nConclusions: Collectively, these results suggest that dietary bLf administration reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and has limited effects on apoptosis of mouse IL. Moreover, these modifying effects of bLf did not result in mucosal protection, as evident in the inability of this protein to reduce DSS-induced tissue damage or formation of aberrant crypts. \n \nPhysiological and Clinical Implications: Although the long term physiological consequences of bLf supplementation in the regulation of intestinal immune homeostasis require further study, the following clinical implications are tentatively suggested by the findings from this thesis research. First, dietary bLf supplementation does not provide direct protection of the intestine during inflammation either with or without exposure to the carcinogen (i.e., AOM); hence, bLf (at least in the dietary concentration and exposure used in these experiments) may not be useful in reducing the formation of aberrant crypts and carcinogenesis. Second, dietary bLf should not be recommended as a supplement at this time for athletes experiencing intestinal distress since it had no impact on tissue indicators of disease in a model (DSS) shown to produce extensive inflammation and tissue pathology. Nonetheless, the findings raise the possibility that bLf can modify both cytokines and apoptotic protein expression in IL and may influence some aspects of inflammatory processes in the gut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207