MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275290708

Australia's 13 Biggest Mistakes

2006· article· en· W2275290708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Allsop, Chris Berg, Jason Briant, Scott Hargreaves, Alan Moran, John Roskam, Louise Staley

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitute of Public Affairs Review: A Quarterly Review of Politics and Public Affairs, The · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)ImmigrationJudgementPoliticsMillLawPolitical scienceWhite (mutation)Public administrationSociologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various government, political and judicial decisions (in some cases following specific events) are argued by the contributors as Australia's 13 biggest mistakes. These are: 13. Invention of Canberra (1908), 12. Patrick White wins the Nobel Prize (1972), 11. Federal money for science blocks at non-government schools (1963), 10. The Release of Cane Toads (1935), 9. Publication of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty (1859), 8. The Labor Party Split (1955), 7. Immigration Restriction Act (1901), 6. WA Town Planning and Development Act (1928), 5. The Uniform Tax Cases (1942 and 1957), 4. The Montreal Olympics (1976), 3. Wireless Telegraphy Act (1905), 2. The Harvester Judgement (1907), 1. The End of the Reid Government (1905).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitute of Public Affairs Review: A Quarterly Review of Politics and Public Affairs, TheSame topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207