MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275392496 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v47i2.54857

"Back to Basics": Rethinking What is Basic to Education Through an Interpretive Study of the Work of Teachers and Students in Elementary School Classrooms

2001· article· en· W2275392496 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David W. Jardine, Patricia Clifford, Sharon Friesen, Annette LaGrange

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPedagogyWork (physics)Mathematics educationPsychologyHumanitiesArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Description d'un projet de recherche visant a reflechir au concept d'education de base. Les grandes lignes et orientations de cette etude sont expliquees en rapport avec les recherches et autres courants pedagogiques et philosophiques de l'education anterieurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicEducational Philosophies and PedagogiesFrench-language works237,207