MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ruxolitinib Overcomes the Adverse Prognostic Effect of Anemia in Patients with Myelofibrosis (MF)

2014· article· en· W2275402064 on OpenAlexaff
Haifa Kathrin Al‐Ali, Viktoriya Stalbovskaya, Prashanth Gopalakrishna, Julian Perez Ronco, Lynda Foltz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisAdverse effectInternal medicineAnemiaProportional hazards modelInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemGastroenterologyOncologyBone marrowMyelodysplastic syndromes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly, improvements in MF-related symptoms and quality-of-life measures, and prolonged survival in 2 phase 3 studies (COMFORT-I and -II). RUX is generally well tolerated, with low rates of nonhematologic adverse events (AEs). As expected based on the mechanism of action of JAK1/JAK2 inhibition, anemia and thrombocytopenia are frequent, but manageable, AEs with RUX. Anemia is a known adverse prognostic factor in MF patients (pts) not receiving JAK inhibitor therapy; however, the prognostic impact of anemia in pts receiving RUX has not been determined. Here, we characterize the dynamics of hemoglobin (Hb) changes with RUX treatment and assess prognostic effects. METHODS: Data from the COMFORT studies, in which pts with MF were treated with RUX 15 or 20 mg bid based on their baseline platelet counts (PLTs), were used to define Hb changes during the course of treatment. Baseline characteristics were evaluated against observed patterns of Hb changes. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the impact of baseline Hb on overall survival (OS) and to evaluate the effect of Hb decreases at wk 12 on observed OS to assess whether on-treatment Hb changes with RUX retain the same prognostic effects as pre-treatment Hb levels in pts with MF in the landmark analysis at wk 12. The models were fit by treatment arm and were adjusted for baseline white cell count, PLT count, age, MF subtype, sex, and spleen length. RESULTS: 301 pts were randomized to RUX and 227 pts to the control group (placebo, n = 154; best available therapy [BAT], n = 73). Median (range) Hb at baseline was 105 g/L (66-170 g/L) and 106 g/L (65-162 g/L) in the RUX groups of COMFORT-I and -II, 105 g/L (35-173 g/L) in the placebo group, and 103 g/L (54-154 g/L) in the BAT group. At wk 12, 82% of pts (247/301) had an Hb decrease of ≥ 3 g/dL from baseline with RUX. This ≥ 3-g/dL decrease was seen in pts with baseline Hb levels of ≥ 10 and < 10 g/dL (72% and 88%, respectively). Baseline spleen volume was also similar for pts with Hb decreases of ≥ 3 and < 3 g/dL, respectively. In pts who did not receive transfusions up to wk 12, mean spleen volume reductions from baseline at wk 24 were −30%, −32%, and −26% for pts with no decrease (n = 14), ≥ 3-g/dL decrease (n = 119), and < 3-g/dL decrease (n = 7) in Hb, respectively. Higher dose intensity during the first 12 wk of RUX treatment not only correlated with more pronounced spleen responses but was also associated with larger decreases in Hb. As reported elsewhere, following the nadir at wk 12, mean Hb levels in the overall population increased to levels similar to those in the control arm (Figure 1). Hb improvement beyond wk 12 was observed despite maintaining pre-nadir dose intensities. Analyses regarding the correlation of reticulocyte count with on-treatment Hb changes will be presented. At the 3-year update, in multivariate models for nontransfused pts, baseline Hb level (per 1 g/dL) was prognostic for OS in the control arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81) but not in the RUX arm (HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.20). Additionally, Hb decreases of ≤ 3 g/dL vs > 3 g/dL at wk 12 were not associated with OS in either arm (control, HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.34-1.49; RUX, HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.27-2.69). These findings were reproducible in the overall population independent of transfusion requirements (Figure 2). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to previous observations in pts with MF, baseline Hb levels in the control arm of the COMFORT studies were prognostic for OS. However, the introduction of RUX appears to dilute the negative prognostic effect of lower Hb on OS, while Hb decreases that occur on treatment do not adversely affect the treatment-related survival benefit. Hb decreases, likely with RUX treatment during the first 12 wks, are dose-dependent but independent of baseline spleen volume and baseline Hb. However, observations here suggest that Hb changes on RUX treatment do not bear the same prognostic implications as Hb changes that occur as a consequence of MF pathology. Together, these data suggest that transient Hb changes during treatment initiation should not lead to premature interruption or discontinuation, although appropriate supportive care and dose titration should be adapted based on a patient’s immediate needs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Al-Ali: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gopalakrishna:Novartis: Employment. Perez Ronco:Novartis: Employment. Foltz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207