MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275420950 · doi:10.59643/1942-9916.1239

Mountain Pine Beetle: How Forest Mismanagement and a Flawed Regulatory Structure Contributed to an Uncontrollable Epidemic, The

2010· article· en· W2275420950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Willms

Bibliographic record

VenueWyoming Law Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Wyoming
KeywordsHabitatMountain pine beetleGeographyEcologyDisturbance (geology)AgroforestryForest structureBiologyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the late 1990s, a tiny insect began ravaging the forests of the Rocky Mountain West, leaving in its wake millions of acres of ghost forests 1 and presenting forest managers and policy makers with the unenviable task of mitigating one of the greatest impacts to western forests in recorded history.The mountain pine beetle is endemic to lodgepole pine dominated forests of the western United States and Canada.For generations, the beetle has quietly killed mature trees and left their remains 2 to provide valuable nesting habitat and food sources for birds and small mammals and a means for younger trees to establish themselves. 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWyoming Law ReviewSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207