The importance of the facial pit of the Northern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis oreganus) under natural conditions in southern British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The facial pits characterizing the snake subfamily Crotalinae have been demonstrated to be important as thermoreceptors in detecting the presence of prey animals and in directing the stroke towards them. So specialized a receptor as the pit organ, if it is to survive, must be functionally effective. If this organ is important in locating prey under natural conditions it would be expected that if these pits were destroyed this importance would be reflected in growth rates, weight changes,, or survival. In twenty of forty snakes collected in the spring of 1963 the pits were destroyed by electric cautery. After weighing, measuring, and marking, the snakes were released at the point of capture. The growth of the recaptured cauterized and non-cauterized snakes was compared. In addition, controlled tests were made with the recaptured snakes, using live mice and light-proof boxes to determine the effectiveness of cautery. A significant statistical difference was found in the growth rates of the females, the cauterized snakes growing more slowly. No difference was found in the growth rates of the males. However, the controlled tests indicates the pits to be important to the males as well as to the females. Weight changes were too variable to reveal differences between normal and cauterized snakes and no difference in survival was evident between the two treatments. To overcome the effect of individual variation in growth rate further study is required of larger samples over a longer time period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".