MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2275566058 · doi:10.1158/1557-3125.myc15-b23

Abstract B23: Pushing Myc inhibition towards the clinic by direct delivery of cell-penetrating peptides

2015· article· en· W2275566058 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Toni Jauset, Daniel Massó-Vallés, Jonathan R. Whitfield, Erika Serrano del Pozo, Cynthia Tremblay, Loïka Maltais, Martin Montagne, Pierre Lavigne, Laura Soucek

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchPeptideCell-penetrating peptideImmunohistochemistryCancerIn vivoBiologyTranscription factorCancer cellTransgeneCellImmunologyGeneBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Inhibiting Myc has long been regarded as a promising cancer treatment. However, clinical Myc inhibition was considered unfeasible due to its central role in normal proliferation and the difficulties of targeting a nuclear transcription factor. The expression of Omomyc (a Myc inhibitor derived from the dimerization and DNA-binding domain of Myc) in the KRasG12D non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mouse model challenged these assumptions, as it resulted in dramatic tumor clearance with only limited and well tolerated side effects in normal tissues (Soucek et al., 2008 and 2013). Omomyc expression proved equally potent in several other mouse models of cancer, revealing the huge potential of this inhibitory approach against multiple cancer types including papilloma, pancreas and glioma (Soucek et al., 2004; Sodir et al., 2011; Annibali et al., 2014). Recently, Max*, a b-HLH-LZ peptide derived from Myc's obligate protein partner Max, was shown to spontaneously enter cells (Montagne et al., 2012). As Omomyc and Max* display high structural homology, we hypothesized that Omomyc could also behave as a cell-penetrating peptide and thus recapitulate the effects of its transgenic counterpart. Our preliminary results show that the Omomyc peptide is well folded in solution; it transduces into cancer cells and effectively stops their proliferation in a dose-dependent manner.In vivo, nasal instillation of fluorescently-labeled Omomyc peptide leads to its rapid distribution to lungs and brain, as well as to other organs (G.I. tract, liver), as observed by IVIS® imaging and immunohistochemistry. Finally, a short treatment with the Omomyc peptide reduces the tumor size and number of Ki67 positive cells in the KRasG12D-induced NSCLC mouse model. In summary, the Omomyc cell penetrating peptide represents a new opportunity to pharmacologically inhibit Myc in a variety of malignant diseases. Citation Format: Marie-Eve Beaulieu, Toni Jauset, Daniel Massó-Valles, Jonathan R. Whitfield, Erika Serrano del Pozo, Cynthia Tremblay, Loïka Maltais, Martin Montagne, Pierre Lavigne, Laura Soucek. Pushing Myc inhibition towards the clinic by direct delivery of cell-penetrating peptides. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Myc: From Biology to Therapy; Jan 7-10, 2015; La Jolla, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2015;13(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B23.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207