Sociolinguistic attitudes, ethnolinguistic identity,and L2 proficiency : the Quebec context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portant sur les relations intergroupes francophones-anglophones au Québec, cette étude est consacrée au rôle du contexte social dans l’apprentissage d’une langue seconde (L2) en milieu scolaire. L’étude a porté sur la relation entre les attitudes envers la L2, la communauté de la L2 et la politique linguistique, d’une part, et la compétence en L2, d’autre part. Le rôle du rapport entretenu avec la L1 et la communauté de la L1 dans la construction de ces attitudes a également été étudié. Au total, 121 élèves francophones et anglophones fréquentant l’école secondaire ont répondu à un questionnaire, et leurs données ont été analysées par rapport aux résultats obtenus aux tests de L2. Des relations significatives entre les attitudes envers la politique linguistique, la L2 et la compétence en L2 ont été confirmées, ainsi que le rôle de l’identité ethnolinguistique dans la construction de ces attitudes. Ces résultats diffèrent selon le groupe linguistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".