Planung und Begrenzung der gemeinsamen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik nach der Osterweiterung der Europäischen Union
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the European Union (EU) has increased permanently since its establishment. Through the adoption of the European Security Strategy (ESS) in 2003, the EU has defined its general goals in the field of foreign and security policy. The ESS raises a number of important questions for the Union not only in the field of CFSP. The ESS distinguishes between member states and non-member states and consequently, raises the question of the final number of member states. In a first step this study analyses the possibilities of deriving compulsory criteria from the ESS due to the limit number of member states. Furthermore, it examines the goals of the foreign and security policy of chosen member states. As the member states decide on wether new states can join the Union, an additional analysis regarding the position of these states and of the European Commission towards further enlargements has been made. The question of the accession of Turkey is in several ways problematic for the EU. The membership of Turkey could be a precedent due to its geographical position. But this question imposes not only on this dimension a knock-on effect for other states seeking membership. Of all the membership-seeking states, Turkey is the largest state with the greatest population and biggest economic strength. Against that background, the question of accession of Turkey is examined unter the guidelines of the ESS from the perspective of the overall CFSP. Another question arising from the ESS concerns the organisation of the CFSP to reach the formulated goals. In this context, an overview of the CFSP and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) is given. The main aspect of this part is the question wether the enlargement of 2004 had an influence on the Unions ability to act. An additional relevant aspect concerns the relationship between the Union and other international players. The relations with the United States, the NATO and Russia are particularly important for the CFSP. After the analysis of the international relations of the Union, proposals of the CFSP are developed. The main focus lies on the involvement of all states with regard to decisionmaking while at the same time maintaining the Union s ability to act.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".