Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The low GWP refrigerants attract a great attention due to the amendment to the Montreal protocol and F-gas regulation. The amendment of Montreal protocol propose to reduce the HFCs consumption by 85% until 2035 and F-gas legislation will reduce the HFCs consumption by 79% until 2030. In 2010, US DOE launched the low GWP refrigerant project which covers the life cycle climate performance modeling, experimental evaluation and field testing. In 2015, Korea launched the project to develop the core technology for low GWP (<100) refrigerant. Since the project limited the GWP value less than 100, the applicable candidates are restricted about five refrigerants including R-1234yf, R-1234ze(E), R-1233zd(E), R-1366mzz and R-444a. In the literature, to the best of the author’s knowledge, there are very limited information for pool boiling heat transfer except R-1234yf. In this study, existing studies for pool boiling heat transfer coefficient of three refrigerants (R-1234yf, R-1234ze(E), R-1233zd(E)) were reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it