MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2276030420 · doi:10.1522/030187664

Heat shock cognate protein 70 (HSC70) est un nouveau partenaire pour la proteine Huntingtin interacting protein-I-related (HIP1R) /

2011· book· fr· W2276030420 on OpenAlexaff
Sadia Mehdi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuntingtinCognateChemistryPhilosophyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Huntingtin interacting protein-1 (HIP1) et Huntingtin interacting protein-1-related (HIPIR) ont été identifiées comme des protéines intervenant dans l'endocytose médiée par les vésicules de clathrine par leurs interactions avec d'autres protéines endocytaires. Pour mieux comprendre les rôles attribués à HIP1/R dans cette machinerie, nous avons procédé à l'identification de nouveaux partenaires d'interaction. Au cours de notre étude, nous avons identifié HSC70 (Heat-shock Cognate Protein70) comme un nouveau partenaire pour les domaines TALIN des deux protéines par des essais de pull-down et analyse par spectrométrie de masse. Au cours de cette étude nous avons identifié également que l'association d'HSC70 avec le domaine TALIN d'HIPIR, compromet sa sédimentation avec les filaments d'actine. HIPIR est une composante du manteau de clathrine, son interaction avec HSC70 l'a impliquée dans le démantèlement des vésicules. Dans cette étude, nous avons vérifié l'intervention d'HIPIR dans le démantèlement de la clathrine suite à son interaction avec HSC70 et la relation de ce mécanisme avec la perte d'interaction avec l'actine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCellular transport and secretion→French-language works237,207→