MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276043341 · doi:10.1158/1538-7755.disp14-b50

Abstract B50: Elucidating the roles of Kaiso in the metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer cells

2015· article· en· W2276043341 on OpenAlexaff
Blessing I. Bassey, Catherine Crawford-Brown, Robin Hallet, Juliet M. Daniel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerCancer researchMetastasisEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionBreast cancerMetastatic breast cancerEstrogen receptorBiologyVimentinCancerOncologyMedicineInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype represent a subset of breast tumours that lack expression of the estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2. Interestingly, TNBC is more prevalent in young women of African ancestry (WAA) than other ethnicities, and WAA have a high mortality despite a low BC incidence compared to Caucasian women. This high mortality rate is attributed to the highly aggressive and metastatic nature of triple-negative tumors and limited treatment options or targeted-therapies. The metastatic nature of TNBC suggests a deregulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) pathway that is often implicated in tumor progression. During EMT, cells downregulate the tumor suppressor and cell adhesion protein E-cadherin and re-express mesenchymal proteins such as N-cadherin and vimentin, which endow the cells with increased motility. During the course of our characterization of the unique transcription factor Kaiso that was implicated as a potential regulator of E-cadherin, we found that increased nuclear expression of Kaiso is significantly correlated with basal/TNBCs. However, little is known about the role of Kaiso in EMT or TNBC metastasis. Thus, the goal of our research is to elucidate the function of Kaiso in TNBC metastasis. To gain insight into Kaiso's role in TNBC metastasis we generated stable Kaiso-depleted TNBC cells (MDA-MB-231) using a Kaiso specific shRNA. Stable Kaiso-depleted cells were then analyzed for the gene expression profile of key EMT markers and for their migratory and invasive capacities in vitro using wound healing and Matrigel invasion assays. We found that Kaiso is highly expressed at both the transcript and protein level in breast tumor cells and tissues. Kaiso-depletion reduced the migratory and invasive capacities of TNBC cells, and induced the down-regulation of potent E-cadherin regulators including Slug and ZEB1 at both the transcript and protein levels. Interestingly, we observed that Kaiso-depletion also resulted in the downregulation of TGFβR1 and TGFβR2; key effectors of the TGFβ signaling pathway. Since TGFβ signaling is a potent inducer of EMT in late stage breast cancer via up-regulation of Snail and/or Slug and ZEB1/2, our results suggests that Kaiso may be promoting TNBC metastasis via the TGFβ signaling pathway. Kaiso's expression might thus be a useful biomarker for TNBC prognosis. Citation Format: Blessing I. Bassey, Catherine Crawford-Brown, Robin Hallet, Juliet Daniel. Elucidating the roles of Kaiso in the metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B50.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207