MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Réflexions sur les dialogues culturels en fonction de perspectives culturelles et a-culturelles de la modernité

2016· article· fr· W2276102739 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Imbert

Bibliographic record

VenueLetras de Hoje · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toute société comme tout individu est la résultante de rencontres et d’inter-influences. Pas de pureté originelle. L’universalisme rationaliste lié à la colonisation est donc critiqué. On analyse à sa place des dialogues culturels fondés sur une conception culturelle de la modernité. Elle se pense comme capacité de toute société à inventer des dynamiques de changement à partir de dissidences internes liées au fait que toute société est clivée entre des discours en compétition. Ces changements sont souvent précipités par la rencontre d’autres discours venus de l’extérieur. Ils métissent les discours en place sans pour autant les éliminer. Tout dialogue culturel est donc fondé sur le fait que la vie est un jeu à somme non-nulle dans lequel tous pourraient gagner, notamment dans la multiplicité des enjeux proposés par la société des savoirs puisque le savoir est une somme non-finie de richesses.*******************************************************************************************************************Reflexões sobre os diálogos culturais em função de perspectivas culturais e aculturais da modernidade Resumo: Toda sociedade, bem com todo indivíduo, é o resultado de encontros de influências mútuas. Não há pureza original. O universalismo racionalista ligado à colonização é, portanto, criticado. Analisam-se, em seu lugar, diálogos culturais fundamentados numa concepção cultural da modernidade. Ela é pensada como capacidade de toda sociedade de inventar dinâmicas demudança a partir de dissidências internas ligadas ao fato de que toda sociedade é dividida em discursos que competem entre si. Essas mudanças são frequentemente aceleradas pelo encontro de outros discursos vindos do exterior. Elas mesclam os discursos do momento sem, com isso, eliminá-los. Todo diálogo cultural é, portanto, fundamentado no fato de que a vida é um jogode soma não anulada no qual todos poderiam ganhar, principalmente na multiplicidade do que está em jogo proposto pela sociedade dos saberes, já que o saber é uma soma não acabada de riquezas.Palavras-chave: Diálogos culturais; Jogo de soma não anulada; Sociedade dos saberes; Modernidade

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetras de HojeSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207