Bone Proliferation in Ankylosing Tarsitis Might Involve Mechanical Stress, and Hormonal and Growth Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: We thank The Journal for the opportunity to address some details in the editorial by Appel and Sieper1 about our recent paper “Bone Lineage Proteins in the Entheses of the Midfoot in Patients with Spondyloarthritis”2. As Appel and Sieper stated1, we reported the lack of inflammatory lesions in our set of tissue samples2. Yet in contrast to their interpretation, our findings did not result from the study of patients in the advanced stage of what we have called “ankylosing tarsitis”, but for reasons that were already mentioned in the paper. Figure 1 does not represent the population included in the study; it illustrates only the most advanced stage of ankylosing tarsitis2. In fact, there were only 3 … Address correspondence to Dr. R. Burgos-Vargas, Rheumatology Department, Hospital General de México, Dr. Balmis 148, México DF 06720, México. E-mail: r.burgos.vargas{at}gmail.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.019 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".