A novel evolutionary clustering algorithm based on Gaussian mixture model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract:- Estimating the optimal number of clusters for a dataset is one of the most essential issues in cluster analysis. Traditional clustering algorithms usually predefine the number of clusters via random selection or contend based knowledge. An improper pre-selection for the number of clusters may easily lead to bad clustering outcome. In order to address this issue we propose in this paper a new evolutionary clustering algorithm based on Gaussian Mixture Model. Specifically, the algorithm defines a new entropy-based fitness function, and two new evolutionary operators for splitting and merging clusters. During the evaluation, we conducted two sets of experiments using a synthetic dataset and an existing benchmark for validating our algorithm. The results obtained in the first experiment show that the algorithm can estimate exactly the optimal number of clusters for a set of data. In the second experiment, we computed three major clustering validity indices and compared the corresponding results with those obtained using established clustering techniques, and found that our evolutionary clustering algorithm achieves better clustering structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it