Dissolution and the Making of the English Literary Canon: The Catalogues of Leland and Bale
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
formation, by this definition, is inaugurated in England at the moment of most intense destruction, the Dissolution of the Monasteries in the first decades of the Reformation. The unlikely pioneers in this case were the antiquaries John Leland and John Bale, who, in the massive bio-bibliographical catalogues they compiled in the 1540s and 1550s, produced the first full-scale objectifications of the canon of British letters. I say "unlikely," because both Leland and Bale were hardly moderns, and were very much concerned to argue for the instrumental value of the literature of the past. Sadly for them and for learning in England, the destruction was of such a scale that it simply overwhelmed their arguments, as well as the antiquarians themselves. Bale wrote that he was moved to tears at the sight of the destruction: "thy s is highly to be lamented, of all them that hath a naturall loue to their contrey. ... That in turnynge ouer of ye super- stycyouse monasteryes, so lytle respecte was had to theyr lybraryes for the sauegarde of those noble & precyouse monumentes."^And Leland, who went mad before he could complete his work, lamented how English books were being stolen and their glory unjustly appropriated by foreign scholars: "the Germans perceiving our desidiousness and negligence, do send daily young scholars hither, that spoileth them, and cutteth them out of libraries, returning home and putting them abroad as monuments of their own country.'"* The catalogues that these antiquaries eventually assembled are haunted by the Dissolution. One of the main functions of these works, and the source of their enduring value for later bibliographers, is to provide a documentary record of as many dispersed items as possible, which explains the antiquaries' overriding concern both for accuracy and comprehensiveness.^But the Dis- solution also haunts these catalogues as a noticeable absence: nowhere in Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Rforme, XXVI, 1 (1991) 57 58 / Renaissance and Reformation these works do Leland and Bale make statements, like those I have just quoted, declaring their regret over the destruction that followed in the wake of the suppression of the abbeys. The above statements, and others like them, appear in the antiquaries' private letters, or in Bale's preface to his edition of Leland's New Year's address of 1546/7 to Henry VIII. ^These catalogues trace a map of dispersal, as Leland and Bale try to keep track of the many rare items they came accross during their researches, but the causes of this dispersal are not discussed. The antiquaries' compelling silence on this matter was for them a difficult trade-off, for the established authority to whom they addressed their appeal was the very same authority, the Tudor Court, that had initiated the Dissolution in the mid-1530s. ^It was also the very same authority that had for a time enlisted Bale as an anti-clerical propagandist, and that had granted Leland his famous commission "to make a search after England's antiquities."^The Court, through its tightly organized network of patronage, exercised full control over the national culture. There was no other possible authority the antiquaries could turn to.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it