MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2276385796 · doi:10.33137/rr.v27i1.11731

Dissolution and the Making of the English Literary Canon: The Catalogues of Leland and Bale

2009· article· en· W2276385796 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueRenaissance and Reformation · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies of British Isles
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCanonArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

formation, by this definition, is inaugurated in England at the moment of most intense destruction, the Dissolution of the Monasteries in the first decades of the Reformation. The unlikely pioneers in this case were the antiquaries John Leland and John Bale, who, in the massive bio-bibliographical catalogues they compiled in the 1540s and 1550s, produced the first full-scale objectifications of the canon of British letters. I say "unlikely," because both Leland and Bale were hardly moderns, and were very much concerned to argue for the instrumental value of the literature of the past. Sadly for them and for learning in England, the destruction was of such a scale that it simply overwhelmed their arguments, as well as the antiquarians themselves. Bale wrote that he was moved to tears at the sight of the destruction: "thy s is highly to be lamented, of all them that hath a naturall loue to their contrey. ... That in turnynge ouer of ye super- stycyouse monasteryes, so lytle respecte was had to theyr lybraryes for the sauegarde of those noble & precyouse monumentes."^And Leland, who went mad before he could complete his work, lamented how English books were being stolen and their glory unjustly appropriated by foreign scholars: "the Germans perceiving our desidiousness and negligence, do send daily young scholars hither, that spoileth them, and cutteth them out of libraries, returning home and putting them abroad as monuments of their own country.'"* The catalogues that these antiquaries eventually assembled are haunted by the Dissolution. One of the main functions of these works, and the source of their enduring value for later bibliographers, is to provide a documentary record of as many dispersed items as possible, which explains the antiquaries' overriding concern both for accuracy and comprehensiveness.^But the Dis- solution also haunts these catalogues as a noticeable absence: nowhere in Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Rforme, XXVI, 1 (1991) 57 58 / Renaissance and Reformation these works do Leland and Bale make statements, like those I have just quoted, declaring their regret over the destruction that followed in the wake of the suppression of the abbeys. The above statements, and others like them, appear in the antiquaries' private letters, or in Bale's preface to his edition of Leland's New Year's address of 1546/7 to Henry VIII. ^These catalogues trace a map of dispersal, as Leland and Bale try to keep track of the many rare items they came accross during their researches, but the causes of this dispersal are not discussed. The antiquaries' compelling silence on this matter was for them a difficult trade-off, for the established authority to whom they addressed their appeal was the very same authority, the Tudor Court, that had initiated the Dissolution in the mid-1530s. ^It was also the very same authority that had for a time enlisted Bale as an anti-clerical propagandist, and that had granted Leland his famous commission "to make a search after England's antiquities."^The Court, through its tightly organized network of patronage, exercised full control over the national culture. There was no other possible authority the antiquaries could turn to.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,783
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,321

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle