MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276435963 · doi:10.2475/10.2015.03

Synaccretionary sedimentary and volcanic rocks in the Ordovician Tetagouche backarc basin, New Brunswick, Canada: Evidence for a transition from foredeep to forearc basin sedimentation

2015· article· en· W2276435963 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. A. Wilson, Cees R. van Staal, William C. McClelland

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryForearcOrdovicianZirconProvenanceSubductionLaurentiaSedimentary rockPaleontologyAccretionary wedgeTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of an Upper Ordovician to lower Silurian (Llandovery) accretionary wedge (Brunswick subduction complex) along the composite Laurentian margin accompanied subduction of the Tetagouche backarc basin and coincided with synaccretionary sedimentation in the Bathurst and Fournier supergroups in northern New Brunswick. These dominantly turbiditic synaccretionary units conformably to unconformably overlie Upper Ordovician pelagic shale and chert in the upper stratigraphic levels of several of the nappes that compose the imbricate thrust stack of the subduction complex. Local occurrences of tectonic mélange at the contacts between the turbidites and their pelagic substrate are consistent with deposition of at least some of the former during thrust-related deformation in the accretionary wedge. Detrital zircon data indicate maximum depositional ages ranging from 454 ± 3 to 459 ± 8 Ma, coeval with initiation of subduction of the Tetagouche backarc basin. In the Elmtree inlier, arc tholeiitic basalt disconformably or unconformably overlies Darriwilian MORB-type pillowed flows that constitute backarc oceanic crust of the Tetagouche basin. Sedimentary rocks immediately below and intercalated with the arc tholeiites contain detrital zircons ranging from 444 ± 6 Ma to 455 ± 10 Ma, suggesting that the tholeiites are related to backarc subduction. Detrital zircon age spectra from all sampled units exhibit a distinct Laurentian signature, indicating an abrupt change in provenance coeval with closure of the backarc basin and Ganderia -- Laurentia collision. The lithology and implied ages of the Bathurst and Fournier synaccretionary sedimentary rocks support a correlation with siliciclastic and carbonate-rich turbidites of the Matapedia cover sequence, which were deposited farther west in a forearc setting (Matapedia forearc) with respect to subduction of Tetagouche backarc oceanic lithosphere. The implication of Late Ordovician influx onto the accretionary wedge and foredeep of sediments having a Laurentian affiliation (like those in the Matapedia forearc), demonstrates trenchward migration of forearc sedimentation between *ca.* 450 and 430 Ma. This southeastward (present coordinates) expansion occurred in concert with episodic accretion of buoyant crustal blocks that populated the Tetagouche -- Exploits basin, and concomitant southeastward step-back of the subduction zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ScienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207