The <scp>M</scp>arch 1972 northwest <scp>G</scp>reenland windstorm: evidence of downslope winds associated with a trapped lee wave
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In March 1972, a severe windstorm buffeted Thule Air Force Base in northwest Greenland with sustained surface winds in excess of 30 m s−1 and gusts exceeding 90 m s−1 – one of the highest surface wind speeds ever directly observed. The high winds were associated with an extratropical cyclone that propagated into the region from the Labrador Sea. It has been argued that katabatic flow off the nearby ice cap contributed to the high winds during the event. Here we use surface and radiosonde data from the region along with an operational analysis as well as both conventional and ‘surface data’ reanalyses to examine the conditions in the region during the windstorm. We find that during the event there was southeasterly flow in the region suggesting that katabatic flow, which would have resulted in easterly or northeasterly flow, was not a significant contributor to the high winds observed at Thule. Rather, we find that the environmental conditions immediately prior to the event were conducive to the excitation of a trapped lee wave forced by the flow over the topographic ridge upwind of Thule. Radiosonde data during the event is consistent with this interpretation and suggests that downslope winds associated with this trapped lee wave were responsible for the observed high winds. Evidence is also presented that corner jets excited by the coastal topography also occur in the region and one such jet contributed to the high wind speeds during this event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".