MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276699525 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-02/31/1173

(Invited) Oxide Interface Is the Device: Properties of Two-Dimensional Electron Gas

2015· article· en· W2276699525 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterojunctionIonic bondingOxideMaterials scienceEpitaxyInterface (matter)ElectronOptoelectronicsFermi gasCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyEngineering physicsChemistryPhysicsIonLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal oxides exhibit rich phase diagrams and exotic physical properties as a result of strong correlations between charge, spin, orbital and lattice. The recent advances of thin film technology allow the synthesis of high-quality epitaxial oxide heterostructures with control at the unit cell level, which enables exploring rich physics and opportunities for future technologies. As a notable example, interesting transport phenomena like 2D electron conduction and orbital reconstruction were discovered at the polar-nonpolar LaAlO 3 /SrTiO 3 (LAO/STO)interface. In this talk, I will first discuss our results of Kondo effect and two-dimensional insulator-to-metal transition obtained on interface-based field effect device with double layer ionic electrolyte as the top gate. Then I will introduce an interface-based nonvolatile resistive switching device, where the ionic drift and alteration of electronic configuration underpin the memory operation. Finally, I will discuss the possible routes to achieving higher electron mobility in such oxide interfaces and the perspective of constructing interface-based photodetectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207