MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276829740 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2015.2494499

A multiport power-flow controller for DC transmission grids

2015· article· en· W2276829740 on OpenAlexafffund
Mike K. Ranjram, Peter W. Lehn

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPower controlController (irrigation)Power (physics)VoltageEngineeringPower transmissionHVDC converterComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an m-port converter structure for high-voltage dc (HVDC) applications to facilitate power-flow routing between k controlled dc buses and m-k independent dc networks. Power-flow control is achieved via the injection of incremental dc voltages between the networks; thus, the converter structure is only rated for a fraction of the rated power and voltage of the connecting dc networks. Unlike previously proposed dc power-flow devices, these incremental dc voltages are generated without requiring power exchange with an external ac network. There are four variants of the structure, each offering unique advantages for deployment. These variants, and the modules that comprise them, are presented. A sample simulation case study is performed to demonstrate three-port bidirectional power-flow control between networks of similar voltage (495/500/505 kV). The proposed converter structure is shown to route power between the networks using modules with megavolt-ampere ratings of approximately 2% of the transmitted power. Thus, the proposed converter structure offers a highly cost-effective means of routing and controlling dc power flows within emerging HVDC grids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207