MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276910137

Participatory Design of a Decision Aid Tool Integrating Social Aspects for the Implementation of at Source Vegetated Best Management Practices (SVBMPs) at the Neighbourhood Level

2013· preprint· en· W2276910137 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Dagenais, Sylvain Paquette, Musandji Fuamba, E. J. Servier, Anya Y. Spector, Lucas Besson, Isabelle Thomas-Maret

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique) · 2013
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)Participatory designCitizen journalismComputer scienceProcess managementEnvironmental resource managementKnowledge managementEnvironmental planningEngineeringEnvironmental scienceOperations managementMathematicsWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At Source Vegetated Best Management Practices (SVBMPs) can help counter the effects of climate change and urbanization on runoff volumes and peak flows, as well as water quality.They also have secondary environmental, aesthetic and social benefits.For these reasons, municipalities seek to implement SVBMPs on a large scale.However, they lack decision aid tools to choose the implementation sites and the appropriate SVBMPs while maximizing secondary benefits.A simple decision aid tool was developed with these considerations in mind.It was tested at a multidisciplinary participatory design workshop with professionals from various backgrounds, which yielded original observations and research avenues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDSpace (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique)Same topicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207