MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2276949080 · doi:10.1190/geo2015-0409.1

Terracing gravity and magnetic data using edge-preserving smoothing filters

2016· article· en· W2276949080 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsSmoothingFilter (signal processing)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionOperator (biology)GeologyEdge-preserving smoothingAlgorithmData processingVariance (accounting)Bilateral filterComputer scienceMathematicsImage (mathematics)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT One major purpose of gravity and magnetic transformations is to produce a result that can be related to geology. The terracing operator achieves this purpose by converting gravity and magnetic data into a geologic map-like field wherein homogeneous domains with sharp domain boundaries are defined. Edge-preserving smoothing filters developed in image processing have the same capability. I have applied the Kuwahara, mean of least variance, and symmetric nearest neighbor filters to gravity and magnetic data. Synthetic and field data examples suggest that these edge-preserving smoothing filters produce terraced effects cleaner than the terracing operator, and the mean of least variance filter often produces the cleanest and sharpest result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207