MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2276993525 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wmp34

Abstract W MP34: Safety and Efficacy of Hydrosoft Coils in the Treatment of the Aneurysm Neck: Preliminary Results From the GEL THE NEC Registry

2014· article· en· W2276993525 on OpenAlexaff
Waleed Brinjikji, Beth B Connelly, D Tubman, Brian L. Hoh, Mary E. Jensen, Michael Kelly, Pascal Jabbour, I Chaudry, Ferdinand Hui, David F. Kallmes

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmOcclusionRadiologyFlow diverterSurgeryStentDemographicsProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: The HydroSoft coil was developed to be placed along the aneurysm neck to enhance intracranial aneurysm healing. In order to better understand the safety and efficacy of Hydrosoft coils in treating the aneurysm neck, the GEL THE NEC multicenter registry was developed. We report immediate angiographic and clinical results of this prospective registry. Methods: The GEL THE NEC study was undertaken at 30 centers in 5 countries. Patients aged 21-90 years with a ruptured or unruptured aneurysm 3-15 mm in size were eligible for enrollment. For each patient the following data were obtained: demographics and comorbidities, aneurysm geometry, use of adjunctive devices, immediate angiographic outcomes, and early (<30 days) adverse events. Postoperative anatomic results were graded by on-site neuroradiologists using the Modified Raymond Scale (Raymond 1=complete obliteration of aneurysm including the neck, Raymond 2=contrast filling the neck of the aneurysm without opacification of the aneurysm sac, Raymond 3=contrast filling the sac of the aneurysm). Predictors of good angiographic outcome were studied using chi-squared and t-tests. Results: A total of 571 patients with 571 aneurysms have been treated thus far in the study (196 ruptured, 375 unruptured). HydroSoft coils were successfully deployed in 549 (96.3%) of these patients. Adjunctive devices were used in 307 cases (53.8%) (212 balloon assistance, 89 stent). Aneurysmal occlusion rates were the following: 261 patients (47.3%) exhibited Raymond 1 occlusion, 257 patients (47.0%) had Raymond 2, and 29 patients (5.3%) had Raymond 3. Early post-operative stroke occurred in 10 patients (1.8%). Aneurysm perforation occurred in 11 patients (1.9%). Coil prolapse/migration occurred in 8 patients (1.4%). Early post-operative death occurred in 3 patients, all of whom presented with SAH (0.5%). Small aneurysm neck size was a significant predictor of good angiographic outcome (P=0.0003). Conclusions: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with HydroSoft coils resulted in high rates of satisfactory occlusion (94.3%) and low rates of major clinical complications. Aneurysm neck size was a significant predictor of angiographic outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→