A incorporação da consciência ambiental no movimento trabalhista do Canadá : os casos de Alberta e Ontário
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essa pesquisa explora a incorporacao de temas ambientais por sindicalistas canadenses em seus discursos e acoes. Uma revisao historiografica confirma que o meio ambiente tem sido dirigido pelo movimento trabalhista atraves do tempo, na ultima decada, um foco na industria ?verde?, na energia renovavel, construcoes adaptadas e no transporte publico forma parte da crescente demanda de trabalho pela criacao de empregos ecologicos. Uma analise da divergencia em atividades ambientais em aliancas de duas frentes do movimento trabalhista, a Federacao do Trabalho de Alberta e o Conselho do Trabalho de Toronto e York, sugere que a primeira pode ser chamada de sindicalismo institucional, enquanto a ultima tende para o sindicalismo de movimento. Empregos ecologicos aparecem em Alberta como empregos de novas industrias criados para alem do setor dominante do petroleo da provincia e como uma resposta a recessao, enquanto em Toronto e York sao vistos, mesmo antes da recessao, como uma substituicao dos empregos perdidos na industria. As descobertas evidenciam que a situacao do emprego local e outros importantes fatores contextuais influenciam a campanha de trabalho relacionada ao meio ambiente Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".