The Presence of a Revolution Load and Its Rotational Speed of Half the Speed of the Journal Are Necessary Conditions for the Half-Frequency Whirl of Radial Bearings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the radial sliding bearing lubrication theory, the half-frequency whirl phenomena are commonly introduced. However, the correlation of the half-frequency whirl theory with the measured resonance phenomenon is low. This paper studies the establishment of the half-frequency whirl theory, and finds that while researchers are aware of the half-frequency whirl, they disregard the necessary conditions of its occurrence. If there is no revolution load, then the half-frequency whirl does not comply with the principle of minimum potential energy. If it does not conform to the principle of minimum energy dissipation, then the half-frequency whirl does not exist. Only when the revolution load exists and its speed is half the speed of the journal will the half frequency whirl occur. Engineering oil whip results from the vibration of the rotating system. A precise radial sliding bearing lubrication theory should use cylindrical coordinates, consider the compressibility of the liquid, and consider the surface shear stress in the journal bearing capacity calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".