MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2277109028 · doi:10.1504/ijedpo.2015.072803

Distance correlation-based nearly orthogonal space-filling experimental designs

2015· article· en· W2277109028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalityComputer scienceDesign of experimentsMetric (unit)Context (archaeology)CorrelationOrthogonal arrayFunction (biology)Sampling (signal processing)Space (punctuation)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsStatisticsMachine learningGeometryTaguchi methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many real-world applications of optimisation, the required model (function) evaluations are determined by expensive and time-consuming physical experiments or numerical procedures. Within this context, the objective of experimental design is to obtain meaningful information based on a strongly limited number of experiments or function evaluations. In order to generate informative designs, space-filling and orthogonality are widely considered to be essential. In this study, we review several existing design performance metrics that address these criteria, and the distance correlation-based metric is proposed for achieving improved experimental design. Three closely related randomised sampling schemes are proposed to generate nearly orthogonal designs with good space-filling properties in real time. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by numerical examples and an illustrative borehole model case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it