Canadiana Bruxellensia: Two Canadian Manuscripts at the Royal Library of Belgium in Brussels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents two documents on Canada, preserved in the Department of Manuscripts of the Royal Library of Belgium (Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België/Bibliothèque royale de Belgique) in Brussels. One is a personal notebook by a Major Henry Scott who visited Canada in 1886–1889; the other is a photo album presented to the participants in a journey through Canada following a congress of the British Medical Association in 1930. RÉSUMÉCet article présente deux documents relatifs au Canada, conservés dans le Cabinet des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque royale de Belgique (Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België), à Bruxelles. Le premier est le carnet personnel d’un Major Henry Scott, qui fit une visite au Canada en 1886–1887; l’autre est un album-photo présenté aux participants d’un voyage à travers le Canada, suite à un congrès de la British Medical Association en 1930.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.041 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".