Forearm muscle metabolism studied using <sup>31</sup>P-MRS during progressive exercise to fatigue after Acz administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of acetazolamide (Acz)-induced carbonic anhydrase inhibition (CAI) on muscle intracellular thresholds (T) for intracellular pH (pH(i)) and inorganic phosphate-to-phosphate creatine ratio (P(i)/PCr) and the plasma lactate (La(-)) threshold were examined in nine adult male subjects performing forearm wrist flexion exercise to fatigue. Exercise consisted of raising and lowering (1-s contraction, 1-s relaxation) a cylinder whose volume increased at a rate of 200 ml/min. The protocol was performed during control (Con) and after 45 min of CAI with Acz (10 mg/kg body wt iv). T(pH(i)) and T(P(i)/PCr), determined using (31)P-labeled magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), were similar in Acz (722 +/- 50 and 796 +/- 75 mW, respectively) and Con (855 +/- 211 and 835 +/- 235 mW, respectively). The pH(i) was similar at end-exercise (6.38 +/- 0.10 Acz and 6.43 +/- 0.22 Con), but pH(i) recovery was slowed in Acz. In a separate experiment, blood was sampled from a deep arm vein at the elbow for determination of plasma lactate concentration ([La(-)](pl)) and T(La(-)). [La(-)](pl) was lower (P < 0.05) in Acz than Con (3.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.0 +/- 1.7 mmol/l) at end-exercise and in early recovery, but T(La(-)) was higher (1,433 +/- 243 vs. 1,041 +/- 414 mW, respectively). These data suggest that the lower [La(-)](pl) seen with CAI was not due to a delayed onset or rate of muscle La(-) accumulation but may be related to impaired La(-) removal from muscle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".