MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2277958174

Farmer suicides in India

2013· article· en· W2277958174 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Vadivel, S. Ponnarasu

Bibliographic record

VenueZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)Suicide ratesAgricultureSocioeconomicsWork (physics)GeographyHealth careSuicide preventionMedicinePoison controlEnvironmental healthEconomic growthEngineeringSociologyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper indicates about farmers suicides in India and also World Health Organization estimated that about 170 000 deaths by suicide occur in India every year, but few epidemiological studies of suicide have been done in the country. World Health Organization had aimed to quantify suicide mortality in India in 2010. It have been undergoing the largest catastrophe of our independent history the suicides of nearly a quarter of a million farmers since 1995. It has largest recorded rate of suicides in human history. government should spent amount to prevent this and care of backbone of Indian Economy. Everybody should want food three times in per day, without contribution of farmers work we can‘t survive everywhere in the world. so we must care about life of Farmers who were already did to attempt to suicide overall the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary ResearchSame topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207