Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article consiste a analyser le probleme de la decolonisation representee dans L’Afficheur hurle de Paul Chamberland. Celui-ci est un poete de la revue Parti pris laquelle s’inscrit dans les mouvements anticolonialiste et anticlerical apparus a l’epoque de la Revolution tranquille au Quebec. Ainsi, ce recueil de poemes est un grand cri de revolte contre la domination coloniale des Anglais et du gouvernement federal d’Ottawa depuis la Conquete anglaise. Chamberland remet en question aussi l’Eglise catholique et la bourgeoisie qui avaient collabore avec le pouvoir colonial. Le poete situe d’abord ses poemes dans la circonstance des annees 1960 au Quebec. Cette epoque est, pour lui, celle de la liberation du joug du colonialisme et de la modernisation de la societe traditionnelle. Ce poete militant s’engage donc dans les luttes de la decolonisation liberatrice. Le poete du Parti pris fait son voyage de descente aux enfers a la maniere d’Aime Cesaire dans son Cahier d’un retour au pays natal. Au cours et a la fin de son voyage il se decouvre “negre blanc d’Amerique”. Il denonce alors la situation alienante dans laquelle le peuple quebecois vit la soumission, la depossession et l’exploitation. Avec son grand cri de colere, il s’attache a retrouver sa dignite humaine pour la creation de l’homme quebecois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".