Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo e uma tentativa de interpretacao das praticas e dos debates atuais sobre a definicao da identidade sexual e da diferenca entre os sexos. Apos constatar a emergencia notavel das minorias sexuais na cultura popular na America do Norte, a autora interroga-se sobre a natureza das transformacoes atuais. Estariamos em presenca de um deslocamento das normas em prol de algumas minorias? Ou seria este um questionamento fundamental do principio de binariedade e de complementariedade natural dos sexos, este credo da modernidade? A autora argumenta que a dissolucao das fronteiras do sexo, que caracteriza os meios culturais populares e eruditos tem ressonância com os debates e praticas que animam outros setores, como a medicina e a tecnociencia entre outros, e que uns e outros se reforcam abrindo assim o caminho a novas configuracoes da sexualidade. Alem da binariedade do sexo, as lutas comecam a se desenhar.m da binariedade do sexo, as lutas comecam a se desenhar. Traducao de Tânia Navarro Swain
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it