MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278156164 · doi:10.5539/ass.v12n3p58

Analysis of the Formation Process of Modernization in Contemporary Iran and Its Effects on Globalization

2016· article· en· W2278156164 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmadi Ghasemabad Sofla Yousef

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobalization and Cultural Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityModernization theoryCivilizationGlobalizationShadow (psychology)PoliticsSociologyPolitical sciencePolitical economyLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Certainly, modernity is one of the characteristics of the present age and we live in the era of modernity. Hence, modernity is the spirit of the new era. This was due to philosophical and intellectual evolution of the West which could put aside mentally worn out tissues and follow the new path. More than a century from modernization life passes in Iran and after the Constitutional Revolution grew and accelerated. In the meantime, Iran could influence from the western scientific and technical, economic, political evolutions and on the basis of its capacity achieves great developments and evolutions. West evolutions were created directly or indirectly by intellectual and philosophical evolutions of West after the Renaissance that it will be remembered modernity. This element in West civilization was endogenous. Hence, development of modernization and subsequently globalization are serious products of modernity which have been developed in the world and their shadow is heavy on the human head. So that escaping of them is impossible.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicGlobalization and Cultural IdentityFrench-language works237,207