MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Figures spatiales de Montréal dans une perspective de géopoétique urbaine

2015· article· fr· W2278322253 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lícia Soares de Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesESPACEArtSociologyArt historyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La réflexion ici s’organise autour de quelques représentations de Montréal qui devient de plus en plus un lieu d’écriture dans la littérature québécoise contemporaine. La ville est un espace physique et palpable avec ses limites géographiques. Mais la tension entre fragmentation et unité urbaine impose une visée privilégiée des espaces urbains dans lesquels s’entrecroisent des foyers culturels spécifiques. Le discours fictionnel rend compte d’un territoire citadin capable de mettre en relation des lieux variés de formations culturelles, de telle sorte que la perspective géopoétique sera assortie d’une confrontation entre certaines figures spatiales de la ville : L'espace-frontière, Montréal des longs voyages (Le souffle de l'Harmattan, Sylvain TRUDEL, 2001) ; L'espace-charnière, Montréal des immigrés et des gangs de rue (Côte-des-nègres, Mauricio SEGURA, 2003) ; L'espace-gigogne, Montréal des itinérants, squatteurs et braconniers (Squeegee, Henri LAMOUREUX, 2003), Montréal de la contreculture et des avant-gardes artistiques (Vamp, Christian MYSTRAL, 2004) et Montréal des suicidaires en série (Paradis, Clef en main, Denis ARCAN, 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.020
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207