MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278404609 · doi:10.14288/1.0105252

Acquisition of a professional role: an empirical study of nursing students' professional self-images and role concepts

2011· article· en· W2278404609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Ann Eells Kariel

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessional developmentPsychologyNursingProfessional studiesMedical educationMedicinePedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study was to examine selected aspects of the acquisition of a professional role and to determine what factors might be related to them. The sample consisted of 301 students in a school of nursing in a large general hospital in a Canadian metropolis. The four groups included entering, newly-capped, intermediate and near-graduating senior students. Data were collected by questionnaire. Two dependent variables were used: the student's professional self-image and the concept of the nurse's role adopted. Four components of the self-image were identified. It was hypothesized that, over time, students would think of themselves increasingly as nurses rather than as students; confidence in performing their role would increase; they would interact more socially with others in the institutional setting; and identification with graduate and student nurses would increase. The first three hypotheses were supported, the fourth was not. It was also hypothesized that, if all four components increased over time for the entire sample, they would also be related for individuals. For example, students who thought of themselves primarily as nurses would also be more confident, would interact more socially with others, and would identify more with other nurses. Statistical analyses using the Chi-square frequency test did not support this hypothesis. For the second dependent variable, the concept of the nurse's role adopted, two major concepts were identified: the advanced professional, emphasizing newer trends in the nursing profession, and traditional, favoring institutional values. It was hypothesized that beginning students would be more likely to give a higher rating than other groups to lay items, that newly-capped students would tend to rate highest those items which reflected the advanced professional concept, and that seniors would give higher ratings to traditional concepts. The trend found was opposite to that hypothesized. Students were asked to rate similar items with respect to Values, things which they believed it was important for nurses to do; Evaluation, criteria by which they believed they were evaluated; and Confidence, the degree to which the item made them feel confident as nurses. Advanced professional items were rated higher for Values than for the other two; traditional, lower. Individual students, however, were inconsistent in their ratings; no relationships were found among ratings on similar items for the three aspects. Other hypotheses suggested that various independent variables would be related to one or more elements of the two dependent-variables. Almost twenty independent variables were proposed. For example, it was hypothesized that students favoring advanced professional values would be more likely to select instructors as role models, and to rate classes such as Sociology, Psychology and Community Health high. None of the hypotheses was supported. The mass of negative findings can be interpreted so as to shed doubt upon some assumptions made by role theorists. Overall, although trends were discernible in the data when analyzed by groups, few relationships were found among attitudes expressed by individual students, who were consistently inconsistent. No factors were found which were related to the acceptance of items representing either an advanced professional or a traditional concept of the nurse's role. Because of the lack of significant relationships among items thought to be representative of each concept, it is probable that no such simple classification exists in the minds of students in the sample. The lack of relationship among elements of the self-concept also suggests that the notion of role as a unitary concept may not be valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207