Heat transport study of field-tuned quantum criticality in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>CeIrIn</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The in-plane electrical resistivity, $\ensuremath{\rho}$, and thermal conductivity, $\ensuremath{\kappa}$, of the heavy-fermion superconductor ${\mathrm{CeIrIn}}_{5}$ were measured down to 40 mK in magnetic fields up to 11 T applied along the $c$ axis. For all fields above ${H}_{c2}=4$ T of filamentary superconductivity, we find that the ratio of heat and charge conductivities in the $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit obeys the Wiedemann-Franz law, $\ensuremath{\kappa}/T={L}_{0}/\ensuremath{\rho}$, where ${L}_{0}=2.45\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8} \text{W}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\text{K}}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ is the Sommerfeld value of the Lorenz number. The temperature-dependent parts of both the electrical and thermal resistivity, $w\ensuremath{\equiv}T/{L}_{0}\ensuremath{\kappa}$, follow the functional dependence expected for the Fermi liquid theory of metals with $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}=A{T}^{2}, w\ensuremath{-}{w}_{0}=B{T}^{2}$, with ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}={w}_{0}$ and $B\ensuremath{\approx}2A$. The coefficient $B$ does not show a significant field dependence even upon approaching ${H}_{c2}=0.4$ T of the bulk superconducting state. The weak response to the magnetic field is in stark contrast with the behavior found in the closely related ${\mathrm{CeCoIn}}_{5}$, in which the field-tuned quantum critical point coincides with ${H}_{c2}$. The value of the electron-electron mass enhancement, as judged by the $A$ and $B$ coefficients, is about one order of magnitude reduced in ${\mathrm{CeIrIn}}_{5}$ as compared to ${\mathrm{CeCoIn}}_{5}$ (in spite of the fact that the zero field ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}$ in ${\mathrm{CeIrIn}}_{5}$ is twice as large as ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}$ in ${\mathrm{CeCoIn}}_{5}$), which suggests that the material is significantly farther away from the magnetic quantum critical point at bulk ${H}_{c2}$ and at all of the studied fields. A suppressed Kadowaki-Woods ratio in ${\mathrm{CeIrIn}}_{5}$ compared to ${\mathrm{CeCoIn}}_{5}$ suggests a notably more localized nature of $f$ electrons in the compound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".