MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278469572 · doi:10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4416

INSTITUTIONAL INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF COURAGE

2013· article· en· W2278469572 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Colleen Sheppard

Bibliographic record

VenueWindsor Yearbook of Access to Justice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesStatus quoCouragePolitical scienceSolidarityPower (physics)SociologyInequalityWelfare economicsLawPhilosophyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the greatest challenges of anti-discrimination law is institutionalized inequality. Recognized in law as systemic discrimination, it is embedded in processes, practices, norms, and relationships that reproduce and accentuate inequality. Legal recognition of the phenomenon, though of critical importance, has not led to effective remedies. Retroactive individual remedies are often too little, too late, following years of slow-moving and difficult litigation. Systemic, proactive laws have been thwarted by institutional resistance to externally imposed change and/or captured by the power of the institutional status quo. This paper explores the challenges of institutional transformation using the idea of courage – the experience of discouragement, encouragement by institutional change-makers, and the power of solidarity to encourage change from the bottom up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWindsor Yearbook of Access to JusticeSame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207