MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278471122

Bob and Jane go to Argentina: The Ethics of Cross-Border Care

2012· article· en· W2278471122 on OpenAlexaff
Elise Smith, Carolina Martin, Jason Behrmann, Bryn Williams–Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesThe InternetPolitical scienceTourismEthnologySociologyArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude de cas présente l'histoire d'une couple Nord-Américain typique à la recherche de traitements de fertilité sur Internet.Cette recherche les conduit sur des sites de cliniques dans d'autres pays, ce qui les amène à penser à voyager à l'étranger pour des services médicauxégalement connu comme le tourisme médical.This case study presents the story of a typical North American couple searching for fertility treatments on the Internet.This search leads to sites of clinics in other countries, which gets them thinking about traveling abroad for medical services -also known as medical tourism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)Same topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207