In-Vivo Neutron Activation Analysis for Aluminium in Bone: System Upgrade and Improve Data Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An existing NaI(Tl) multidetector array at McMaster University used for in vivo measurement of aluminum by means of neutron activation has been recently upgraded with an in-house built pulse processing system. The new system is capable of collecting spectra in coincidence and anticoincidence modes which allows for better discrimination between the 1.78 MeV 28 Al peak and the interfering 38 Cl peak. The system is interfaced with Matlab and controlled using a custom graphical user interface, which provides periodic spectral data storage during the acquisition. This feature makes it possible to validate the acquired data and the spectral fitting routines through half-life analysis of the radionuclides. A new set of calibration phantoms spanning a narrower range of aluminum concentrations than employed in the previous study, has also been developed. The combined effect of the new improvements resulted in the minimum detectable level of aluminum in aqueous solutions containing Na, Cl, and Ca in physiological levels, equal to approximately 3 µgAl/gCa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it