MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278576287

Tide modelling in the northwest Atlantic

2007· dissertation· en· W2278576287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shastri Paturi

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayTurbulence modelingGeologyOceanographyData assimilationHomogeneousTurbulenceTidal ModelHorizontal resolutionClimatologyGeodesyGeographyMeteorologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three dimensional tidal model for the northwest Atlantic was developed including the 8 leading semi-diurnal (M₂, S₂, N₂ and K₂) and diurnal (K₁, O₁, P₁, & Q₁) constituents. Altimetric tides from TOPEX/Poseidon, TOPEX Tandem Mission, JASON-1, ENVISAT, and GFO missions were assimilated into the model. The model was a primitive equation, sigma coordinate system in the vertical, finite difference Princeton Ocean Model (POM). The model used a horizontal rectilinear grid of 1/12° X /12° resolution. The vertical eddy viscosity is computed using the Mellor and Yamada (1982) level 2.5 turbulence model. The model domain covers the region from 75°W to 42°W and 36°N to 66°N. The model is forced at the boundaries with elevations and depth averaged currents for the 8 semidiurnal and diurnal constituents extracted from a North Atlantic Model (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002). We carried out experiments with homogeneous and stratified (summer-diagnostic) fluid, with and without assimilation, and their results are compared. -- The model reproduced the M₂, S₂, N₂, K₁ and O₁ tidal elevations to an accuracy of 2.1 cm, 1.6 cm, 0.9 cm 1.2 cm & 0.9 cm respectively excluding the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine region. Including the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine region, the accuracy is 10.7 cm, 2.8 cm, 2.5 cm, 1.3 cm and 1.1 cm respectively. Assimilation improved the model tidal elevation by a factor of 40-60%. The semi-diurnal tidal currents agreed to better than the diurnal constituents with observations. The agreement was best for the Georges Bank region indicating the model's capability to handle strong tidal current variability well. Assimilation improved the model tidal currents by roughly 20-30%. An enhancement of the K₁ and O₁ tidal elevation and currents at the shelf edge of Labrador is found in the model, in agreement with theory and observations. -- Inclusion of horizontally and vertically varying stratification indicates that stratification has a significant influence on the vertical profile of currents in the shallow areas. Tidal currents decrease in the bottom boundary, increase significantly in the rest of the bottom layer, and decrease in the upper and middle water column. Stratification improves the K₁ and O₁ currents very slightly by ~5%. Bottom friction and vertical eddy viscosity both played an important role in the shallow areas, especially in the Bay of Fundy, Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank and Scotian Shelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207