MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2278796394 · doi:10.2118/175964-ms

A Material Balance Equation for Stress-Sensitive Shale Gas Reservoirs Considering the Contribution of Free, Adsorbed and Dissolved Gas

2015· article· en· W2278796394 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Orozco, Roberto Aguilera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersChina National Offshore Oil Corporation
KeywordsKerogenOil shaleAdsorptionNatural gasMethaneVolume (thermodynamics)Petroleum engineeringPorosityChemistryLangmuirOil shale gasFossil fuelMineralogyGeologyUnconventional oilThermodynamicsSource rockOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Unconventional shale gas reservoirs around the world have been proven to store gigantic volumes of natural gas. It has been demonstrated with both laboratory and mathematical work that these reservoirs can be represented by a quintuple porosity formulation plus an additional storage mechanism provided by dissolved gas in kerogen. All these storage mechanisms must be considered for estimation of original gas in place (OGIP). Otherwise pessimistic values of OGIP and recoveries will be obtained by ignoring any of these mechanisms. This paper presents a new easy-to-use Material Balance Equation (MBE) for shale gas reservoirs that considers the contribution of free, adsorbed and dissolved gas and their effects on cumulative gas production. Furthermore the proposed MBE takes into account the stress-dependency of permeability and porosity as the reservoir is depleted. Aguilera (2008) formulated a MBE to account for the effect of fracture compressibility on OGIP determination in stress-sensitive naturally fractured reservoirs. Cabrapan et al. (2014) extended the method by incorporating adsorption in shale gas reservoirs. The authors used the Langmuir Adsorption theory for quantifying the adsorbed gas volume as a function of average reservoir pressure. In this paper, the method is further extended to include the effect of production by diffusion of dissolved gas from kerogen. The volume of dissolved gas depends on the total fractional volume of kerogen in shale and the methane concentration in the kerogen body, which is in turn a function of pressure and temperature, as proposed by Swami et al. (2013). Results are presented as crossplots of P/Z (pressure/gas deviation factor) vs. Gp (cumulative gas production), Gp vs. time and gas rate vs. time. The plots allow detecting four stages of production in a shale gas reservoir: 1) production of free gas from fractures and organic porosity, 2) production of free gas from the inorganic matrix when fractures start closing, 3) production by desorption from the organic material and 4) production by diffusion of dissolved gas. The same trends have been observed in Devonian Shales of the Appalachian Basin where long production histories are available. It is concluded that dissolved gas is not only an additional storage mechanism but it also provides an important pressure and production contribution in shale reservoirs. The new consideration introduced in the MBE proposed in this paper is of importance because although diffusion from kerogen in shale gas reservoirs is by nature a slow process, it provides long term production rates with relatively small declines. To the best of our knowledge, an analytical MBE that includes simultaneously stress-dependent porosity and permeability, free gas, adsorbed gas and dissolved gas has not been published previously in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207