MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2279101240 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r241-12

Comparison of RDII Unit Hydrograph Approaches for Continuous Simulation using SWMM 5

2011· article· en· W2279101240 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
B. Sherman, Greg Barden, Hunter Kelly, Tim Fallara, Edward Burgess

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrographUnit (ring theory)Computer scienceMathematicsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous simulation of collection systems allows the modeler to quantify the frequencies of overflows, runtimes of pumps, utilization and dewatering durations of storage, and other important characteristics of wet-weather system performance. SWMM 5 uses the RTK unit hydrograph approach to calculate rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDII). SWMM 5 allows up to eighteen empirically derived unit hydrograph parameters which may be varied monthly. These parameters can be used in different ways through various emphases and parameter combinations including omission of some of the parameters In some cases similar accuracy can be attained in a particular objective measure, such as peak flow, when using another approach. A consistent approach is recommended to facilitate more equitable comparisons between modeled sanitary sewer service areas, both in terms of the parameters used and the simulation results produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207