MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2279146786

Когнитивные нарушения при сахарном диабете 2 типа

2015· article· ru· W2279146786 on OpenAlex
I. Gatskikh, О. Ф. Веселова, И. Н. Брикман, Т. Shalda, Р А Адамян, М М Петрова

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueСовременные проблемы науки и образования · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionCognitive impairmentNeuropsychologyRating scaleType 2 diabetesScale (ratio)MedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyDiabetes mellitusPsychiatryDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review presents the modern ideas about cognitive impairments, that appear in patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. At this article presented epidemiologic data, proving increasing frequency of occurrence of cognitive disfunctions in type 2 diabetes. Discusses the levels of cognitive impairment and the most well-known methods of diagnosis. In particular, discusses the methods of diagnosis of cognitive impairment using neuropsychological screening scales such as the brief scale of mental status estimation (MMSE), the Battery of tests for frontal dysfunction (FAB), Montreal rating scale of cognitive functions (MoCA). Conducted analysis of available modern studies demonstrating the phenomenon of cognitive impairment, as manifestations of type 2 diabetes, and presented modern ideas about the pathogenesis of cognitive impairments in type 2 diabetes, proving multifactorial of this pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it