Fashion Design from Woven Fabrics of Community Enterprise Group
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The objectives of this study were to 1) design fashion and bags from woven fabrics of the community enterprise group in Pitsanulok province 2) compare the quality of products based on the criteria used to measure community products classified by features, genders, level of income and 3) present a prototype from local woven fabrics in Pitsanulok province. The research procedure includes the sample group which incorporates 67 consumers in their working ages. Accidental sampling design was implemented. The instruments were modified and validated by the standard of community products scp. 196/2003 entitled handmade products from fabrics quality assured in terms of the product neatness, benefits, materials, and manufacturing processes as well as marketing possibility and career advancement. The results were that the fashion design and bags from the local woven fabrics proposed as the prototype had their own valued adding and could be able to market. As regards the quality assurance, the satisfactory level was good. Also, when the satisfactory level of the consumers towards the products were compared regarding genders and level of income, there was no significant differences found.<strong></strong></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it