Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avant le Code de 1917, les auteurs jugeaient que la delegation devait etre notifiee au delegue et acceptee par lui pour qu'elle soit efficace. Ce fut encore le point de vu dominant apres le Code de 1917, mais certains auteurs ont reconnu que les canons 37 et 38 de ce Code, qui disaient que les rescrits ne necessitent pas de notification ou d'acceptation, s'appliquaient egalement a la delegation des facultes. Cette etude montre que, en vertu de la loi du Code de 1983, la delegation est habituellement percue comme un decret particulier (la provisio du canon 48). Le canon 54, § 1, dit que les decrets deviennent en vigueur a partir du moment ou ils sont communiques au destinataire, mais cela ne s'applique qu'aux decisions et aux preceptes, et non pas aux provisions. L'auteur conclut, sur la base de divers arguments provenant de la loi naturelle et positive, que la delegation d'une faculte est effective a partir du moment ou elle est accordee et peut etre utilisee validement avant meme que le delegue ne soit consicent que cette faculte lui a ete accordee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".