La Barbarie refinada: The Crisis of European Modernity in Gómez Carrillo’s Chronicles of the First World War
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo analiza la crítica a la Modernidad europea desarrollada por Enrique Gómez Carrillo en sus crónicas de la Primera Guerra Mundial – uno de los conjuntos textuales más notables de la recepción, mayormente ignorada por la crítica, de este conflicto armado en América Latina. Aunque no libre de tonos propagandísticos a favor de los Aliados, las crónicas de Gómez Carrillo denuncian sin ambigüedades la brutalidad de la Gran Guerra y la involución del continente europeo hacia lo que el autor define como “la barbarie refinada” – una fusión de las más avanzadas tecnologías militares con la violencia más extrema. Gómez Carrillo documenta obsesivamente el impacto de este nuevo fenómeno en los paisajes humanos y naturales del continente, denunciando el colapso del prestigio cultural y moral de Europa y el efecto deshumanizante de la guerra tecnológica moderna sobre los soldados. Como resultado de esta crítica sin cuartel a la civilización europea y a las narrativas eurocéntricas del Progreso predominantes hasta ese momento, las crónicas de Gómez Carrillo sientan las bases para el surgimiento durante los años 1920 de una identidad latinoamericana que, con redoblada seguridad en sí misma, desarrolla nuevos modelos para una Modernidad autóctona en América Latina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".