MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2279296484 · doi:10.30097/fjmh.200205.0009

The Canadian Medical Insurance and the Care of the Elderly A Lesson for Taiwan

2002· article· en· W2279296484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignityGovernment (linguistics)Health careSocial securityBusinessEconomic growthPublic relationsPolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a study of the health insurance, especially the care of the elderly in Canada and how these Canadian programs could help Taiwan to develop a qualitative care for its citizens. The characteristics of the Canadian health insurance system as revealed through its upheld principle are namely, universality, accessibility, comprehensiveness, portability and public administration. These principles have served as guidelines to all Canadian health care programs. In regard to the care of the elderly in Canada, the best example is Ontario's program of Human Habitat. This program is based on idea called the Eden Alternative which emphasizes a wholistic atmosphere of a living environment. Home care is another way the Canadian government developed to enhance the elderly's self-worth by helping them live in their own familiar homes with dignity and comfort. Taiwan is contemplating a social program to help her elderly. A monthly cheque similar to the Canadian old age pension is under consideration at the moment. Would Taiwan develop a good qualitative program? If so, the Canadian system could serve as good model for Taiwan to ponder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it