MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2279406644 · doi:10.1155/2005/195986

Are You Willing to Implicate Villin in Progressive Cholestasis of Childhood?

2005· article· en· W2279406644 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kelly W. Burak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCalgary General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVillinCholestasisPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

261 Over 30 years ago, Dr MJ Phillips first described the fatal intrahepatic cholestatic liver disease known as Byler’s syndrome (1). More recently, genetic defects in the bile salt excretory pump and the MDR3 phospholipid transporter have been described as causes of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (2,3). Nevertheless, the exact pathophysiological basis underlying the development of most cholestatic liver diseases in both children and adults remains unknown. Recently, Phillips et al (4) from the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario published their findings implicating a defect in the expression of the villin gene as a cause of a biliary atresia-like disorder in three pediatric patients. Villin is a protein that is involved in the binding, bundling and severing of actin, thereby playing an important role in maintaining the structure of the bile duct canalicular microvilli (5). Although these three patients had progressive cholestasis and liver failure resembling biliary atresia, they exhibited unique ultrastructural abnormalities within microvilli of their bile duct canaliculi as well as a lack of villin messenger RNA and protein expression (4). In this study, Phillips et al used electron microscopy to examine the explanted livers of 50 patients who underwent liver transplantation at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario for biliary atresia. Three of the patients were noted to have unusual ultrastructural abnormalities of the canalicular microvilli on electron microscopy. All three patients had persistent jaundice that was originally attributed to biliary atresia and all required liver transplantation at a young age. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated the absence of staining for villin in these three patients, in contrast to its presence in hepatectomy specimens from cases of classic biliary atresia, other cholestatic liver diseases and in normal livers. In all three cases, Western blot analysis demonstrated the lack of a villin band and there was abnormal villin messenger RNA expression by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Although the three villin-deficient patients eventually developed liver failure that was clinically indistinguishable from classical biliary atresia, their early liver biopsies revealed distinctive abnormalities, including giant cell hepatitis, portal inflammation and mild cholestasis with mild fibrosis despite significant ductopenia (4). Based on their eloquent study, the authors proposed a new mechanism of progressive cholestasis, involving biliary canalicular microvillus structural defects that result from the loss of villin function (4). Because genetic studies were not performed in these patients, it is not clear if the loss of villin function represents a primary genetic defect in villin synthesis, or if it is an acquired defect resulting from an environmental attack (perhaps by a virus) or as a consequence of cholestasis itself (6). Nonetheless, it is an intriguing and important finding from a group of Canadian researchers, and we are likely to hear more about the role of villin in other cholestatic disorders in the future. CANADIAN GASTROENTEROLOGY ELSEWHERE

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→